<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Articles</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Articles:</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/article" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://acreform.com/site/atom/" />
    <updated>2010-08-31T15:53:07Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2010, admin</rights>
    <generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.6.8">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:08:10</id>


    <entry>
      <title>ALERT &#45; N.Y. Governor Signs Into Law Limits on Charitable Deductions</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/alert_-_n.y._governor_signs_limits_on_charitable_deductions/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.179</id>
      <published>2010-08-10T15:03:32Z</published>
      <updated>2010-08-10T21:41:33Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <category term="Add to Pressing Topic"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/pressing_topic/"
        label="Add to Pressing Topic" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>The <i>Chronicle of Philanthropy</i> reports that New York Governor David A. Paterson has signed into law a revenue bill passed by the state&#8217;s legislature that limits charitable deductions for wealthy residents. New Yorkers with state-adjusted gross incomes above $10-million annually&#8212;about 3,500 taxpayers&#8212; are now able to write off only 25 percent of their charitable contributions on their state income taxes rather than the previous 50 percent.</p>

<p><i>&#8220;The last thing on earth charities need is a disincentive from the government to people who are their donors, especially their biggest donors,&#8221;</i> says Abigail Disney, New York philanthropist and grandniece of Walt Disney. </p>

<p>She makes a stark prediction: <i>&#8220;New York is a leader in philanthropy, so what New York does I can&#8217;t imagine other states won&#8217;t follow,&#8221; </i>she said, adding: <i>&#8220;Congress could go looking at it, too.&#8221;</i></p>

<p><a href="http://philanthropy.com/article/NY-Governor-Signs-Into-Law/123863/?sid=&amp;utm_source=&amp;utm_medium=en" title="Read full coverage here.">Read full coverage here.</a>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>New York Passes Budget, Trims Charitable Deduction for Thousands of New Yorkers</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/new_york_passes_budget_trim_charitable_deduction/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.177</id>
      <published>2010-08-04T17:51:27Z</published>
      <updated>2010-08-10T21:44:28Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Last night, the New York Senate joined the Assembly in passing a budget plan that included a provision limiting the deduction for those who earn more than $10 million annually to only 25 percent of their charitable contributions, rather than the current 50 percent. This affects approximately 3,500 New York taxpayers and would be in effect for three years, including the current 2010 tax year. Governor David Paterson is expected to sign the budget into law. </p>

<p>ACR and The Philanthropy Roundtable joined efforts with other national nonprofit organizations to express <a href="http://www.acreform.com/article/action_alert_-_charitable_deduction_in_new_york_is_at_risk/" title="opposition">opposition</a> to this measure. ACR is also concerned that this may signal a trend we&#8217;ll see in other states and in Washington.</p>

<p>For full coverage, visit the <i><a href="http://philanthropy.com/article/New-York-Legislature-Passes/123757/" title="Chronicle of Philanthropy">Chronicle of Philanthropy</a></i>.</p>

<p>Click <b><a href="http://www.acreform.com/article/action_alert_-_charitable_deduction_in_new_york_is_at_risk/" title="here">here</a></b> for additional background on this issue.</p>

<p> </p>

 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Discussion on American Philanthropy &amp;amp; Threats to Philanthropic Freedom</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/discussion_on_american_philanthropy_threats_to_philanthropic_freedom/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.178</id>
      <published>2010-08-03T20:16:30Z</published>
      <updated>2010-08-11T13:36:32Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Achieving Results"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/achieving_results/"
        label="Achieving Results" />
      <category term="Good Giving"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/good_giving/"
        label="Good Giving" />
      <category term="Federal Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/federal-legislation/"
        label="Federal Legislation" />
      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>This edition is dedicated to threats to philanthropic freedom and features Former Attorney General of the United States and Pennsylvania Governor Dick Thornburgh leading a discussion with Dr. Larry P. Arnn, President of Hillsdale College; Heather R. Higgins, President and Director of The Randolph Foundation; and Adam Meyerson, President of The Philanthropy Roundtable. The three reflect on the American tradition of philanthropy and the growing movement to impose further government regulation on the philanthropic world.
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Hot Off the Presses</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/hot_off_the_presses/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.176</id>
      <published>2010-07-30T19:43:44Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-30T19:44:45Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>The latest edition of the ACR newsletter is now <a href="http://acreform.com/about/newsletter" title="available">available</a>.
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Sacrificing &#8220;Sacred Cows&#8221;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/sacrificing_sacred_cows/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.175</id>
      <published>2010-07-30T17:03:40Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-30T17:10:41Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Federal Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/federal-legislation/"
        label="Federal Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><i>There are various third rails in politics &#8211; things politicians don&#8217;t generally touch for fear of the backlash. Programs like Medicare and Social Security, farm subsidies, and veteran&#8217;s benefits. </p>

<p>And there are some third rails in the tax world as well. For years, Congress has implemented and extended popular tax deductions and credits for both individuals and institutions that have achieved a &#8220;sacred cow&#8221; status. The home mortgage interest deduction and the R&amp;D tax credit are just two such examples&#8230; </p>

<p>Set this against our country&#8217;s current fiscal situation: Rising national debt and new public policy priorities&#8230; Suddenly, those sacred cows in tax world aren&#8217;t so sacred anymore. </p>

<p>Nonprofits are not immune from this debate &#8211; the charitable deduction is considered a tax expenditure&#8230; What does this mean for us?</i>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>ALERT &#45; Charitable Deduction in New York is at Risk</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/action_alert_-_charitable_deduction_in_new_york_is_at_risk/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.168</id>
      <published>2010-07-19T14:16:33Z</published>
      <updated>2010-08-10T19:33:34Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <category term="Add to Pressing Topic"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/pressing_topic/"
        label="Add to Pressing Topic" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <blockquote><p><b>Update:</b><br />
<b><i>August 10, 2010 </i></b>- New York Governor David A. Paterson has signed into law a revenue bill passed by the state&#8217;s legislature that limits charitable deductions for wealthy residents.</p>

<p>Read full coverage <a href="http://philanthropy.com/article/NY-Governor-Signs-Into-Law/123863/?sid=&amp;utm_source=&amp;utm_medium=en" target="_blank">here</a>.
</p></blockquote> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>A Canary in the Coal Mine &#8211; Capping the Charitable Deduction</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/a_canary_in_the_coal_mine_capping_the_charitable_deduction/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.174</id>
      <published>2010-07-16T18:17:39Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-19T15:13:40Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Federal Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/federal-legislation/"
        label="Federal Legislation" />
      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Unlike the federal government, every state except Vermont has some form of balanced budget requirement. What does this mean in practical terms for the future of philanthropy?&nbsp; </p>

<p>We all know that the economy has not been kind to state and federal budgets. At the federal level, the government has responded by pumping money into the economy, in the hopes of jumpstarting economic growth and in the process running up enormous deficits. But balanced budget requirements at the state level won&#8217;t allow that and as a result, states are in the hunt for revenue with a vengeance. 
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Hawaiian Governor Vetoes Cap on Charitable Deduction</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/hawaiian_governor_vetoes_cap_on_charitable_deduction/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.173</id>
      <published>2010-07-13T15:36:48Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-13T15:51:49Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Governor Linda Lingle vetoed <a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2010/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&amp;billnumber=1907" title="H.B. 1907">H.B. 1907</a> a tax bill that would have capped itemized deductions for higher income individuals including charitable contributions. The measure would have resulted in tax increases totaling more than $140 million over the next five years.&nbsp; </p>

<p>The non-profit community expressed concerns to Governor Lingle that this measure would discourage donations and contributions from individuals and small businesses since they would no longer be able to deduct these contributions on their State income tax returns.</p>

<p>Lingle noted in a Statement of Objection (see below), <i>&#8220;Our community is still feeling the impacts of the recession and this is the time when we want to encourage donations to charitable organizations, not enact laws that hinder them.&#8221; </i></p>

<blockquote><p><b>Download:</b><br />
- <a href="http://hawaii.gov/gov/news/releases/2010-news-releases/governor-lingle-vetoes-bills-that-discourage-investments-charitable-contributions" target="_blank">Press Release: Governor Lingle Vetoes Bills that Discourage Investments, Charitable Contributions </a><br />
- <a href="http://hawaii.gov/gov/leg/2010-legislative-session/bills/vetoes/HB1907%20SOBJ.pdf" target="_blank">Governor&#8217;s Statement of Objection</a> </p></blockquote> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>ACR, Roundtable Respond to Criticism of FL Legislation</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/acr_roundtable_respond_to_criticism_of_fl_legislation/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.172</id>
      <published>2010-07-12T14:49:05Z</published>
      <updated>2010-08-03T14:14:06Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>On Sunday, July 11, 2010, the <i>Chronicle of Philanthropy </i>published a Letter to the Editor from Sue Santa, Senior Vice President for Public Policy at The Philanthropy Roundtable, in response to an opinion piece by Emmett Carson, President of the Silicon Valley Foundation. Carson was critical of the Florida legislation (<a href="http://acreform.com/article/ACR_bill_protect_foundation_giving/" target="_blank"><b>SB 998</b></a>) advanced by ACR and the Roundtable to protect philanthropic freedom. </p>

<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt from Santa&#8217;s piece:<br />
<i>&#8220;We at The Philanthropy Roundtable agree with Emmett Carson that &#8220;government should not be in the business of deciding who sits on foundation boards or which nonprofit organizations receive grants based on demographics.&#8221; And this is precisely the intent of the new Florida law on philanthropic freedom&#8212;no more, no less.&#8221;</i></p>

<blockquote><p>View both articles here:<br />
- Letter to the Editor: <b><a href="http://philanthropy.com/article/Florida-s-New-Foundation-Law/66184/" target="_bank">Florida&#8217;s New Foundation Law Protects Donor Intent</b></a><br />
- Opinion: <b><a href="http://philanthropy.com/article/Florida-Law-Makes-It-Hard-f/65856/" target="_blank">Opinion: New Fla. Law Makes It Harder for Foundations to Live Up To Values</a></b>
</p></blockquote><p>
&nbsp;  &nbsp;  
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>New Publication Challenges &#8220;Public Money&#8221; Argument of Philanthropic Dollars</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/new_publication_challenges_public_money_argument/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.171</id>
      <published>2010-07-07T20:51:21Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-07T21:11:22Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Achieving Results"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/achieving_results/"
        label="Achieving Results" />
      <category term="Good Giving"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/good_giving/"
        label="Good Giving" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>The newly released article <b><i>Respecting Foundation and Charity Autonomy: How Public is Private Philanthropy?</b></i> in the Chicago Kent Law Review, Number 85, Volume 2 reexamines the &#8220;public money&#8221; argument. It was published as one of several articles included in the &#8220;<a href="http://www.cklawreview.com/issues/archive-vols-84-85/vol-85-no-2/" title="Symposium on the Law of Philanthropy in the Twenty-First Century">Symposium on the Law of Philanthropy in the Twenty-First Century</a>&#8221;.</p>

 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Third Time&#8217;s Not a Charm</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/third_times_not_a_charm/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.170</id>
      <published>2010-07-01T19:14:51Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-01T15:30:52Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Federal Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/federal-legislation/"
        label="Federal Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><i>Earlier this year, Congress passed a massive health care bill which is now law.&nbsp; In very short order, Congress is expected to approve a massive overhaul of the rules governing the financial services sector &#8211; known as the Wall Street Reform bill.</p>

<p>So you might ask why did the Senate spend nearly eight weeks and try multiple times to close off debate on a relatively modest package of tax provisions (about $12 billion a year over ten years) that aren&#8217;t new, are pretty popular, and are merely extensions of current law?</p>

<p>The short answer is 60 votes, concerns about deficit spending and controversy over how to pay for these tax provisions&#8230;Needless to say, House Democrats are not amused. What does this mean going forward?</i>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Update &#45; Consumer Financial Legislation</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/update_-_consumer_financial_protection/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.169</id>
      <published>2010-07-01T15:10:37Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-09T20:39:38Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Federal Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/federal-legislation/"
        label="Federal Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><i>As of Jult 1, 2010</i> - <br />
As we previously reported, the House and Senate have been working to reconcile the differences between their versions (H.R. 4173/S. 3217) of the financial regulatory reform legislation &#8211; the Wall Street Reform bill.&nbsp; Earlier this week, they completed their work <b>which included important provisions that ACR and others worked hard to include</b> (see letter from ACR and Nonprofit Coalition here).&nbsp; These provisions remove most nonprofits that offer charitable giving advice and group financial education from regulation, fees and oversight.</p>

<p>These provisions are a big win for the nonprofit community.&nbsp; Our advocacy efforts coupled with your examples about this bill&#8217;s impact on your day-to-day operations resonated with Members of Congress.</p>

<p>A final financial services reform conference report must now be approved by both the House and Senate. We expect the House and Senate to pass the final bill shortly.</p>



<p>&nbsp;</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Death &amp;amp; Taxes</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/death_taxes/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.165</id>
      <published>2010-06-18T17:19:07Z</published>
      <updated>2010-06-18T18:30:08Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Federal Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/federal-legislation/"
        label="Federal Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><i>You know the old adage that death and taxes are the only sure things in life? Well for the time being at least one of those certainties is in question &#8211; on January 1 of this year, the tax on estates disappeared and went to zero. That&#8217;s right, zero. </p>

<p>So Congress must be working night and day to resolve the issue right? Wrong. With half of 2010 behind us, there is no clear plan to deal with the estate tax. </p>

<p>Why? Keep Reading&#8230;</i>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Florida Law Stands Up for Charity</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/florida_law_stands_up_for_charity/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.164</id>
      <published>2010-06-14T18:42:27Z</published>
      <updated>2010-07-15T16:49:29Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="State Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/state-legislation/"
        label="State Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>In today&#8217;s <i>Washington Examiner and San Franciso Exmainer</i>, Adam Meyerson, president of the Philantrhopy Roundtable, provides commentary on the <a href="http://acreform.com/article/ACR_bill_protect_foundation_giving/" title="recent bill ">recent bill </a>passed in Florida to protect philanthropic giving.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt:<br />
<i>&#8220;Americans are increasingly worried about government overreach into areas of the economy and society that would have seemed unimaginable just a few years ago. So it is refreshing to see that private-sector leaders in at least one important area&#8212;charitable giving&#8212;are starting to push back.</p>

<p>Earlier this month, the state of Florida passed <a href="http://acreform.com/article/ACR_bill_protect_foundation_giving/" title="a law">a law</a> that actually limits the ability of the state to interfere with its citizens&#8217; private charitable giving. The new law guarantees charitable donors the freedom to give to the charities they care about and in the manner that they think will be most effective.</p>

<p>Overall private giving is likely to increase, to the benefit of all. It&#8217;s an encouraging example that other states may soon be following.&#8221;</i></p>

<p>Click here to read the full op-eds:<br />
- <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Florida-law-stands-up-for-charity-96255669.html" target="_blank"><b>Washington Examiner</b></a><br />
- <b><a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/oped_contributors/Florida-stands-up-for-charity-as-government-threatens-to-step-in-96257464.html" target="_blank">San Franciso Exminer</a></b></p>



<p>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>&#8220;No New Debt Democrats&#8221;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://acreform.com/site/no_new_debt_democrats/" />
      <id>tag:acreform.com,2010:article/1.162</id>
      <published>2010-06-04T20:46:52Z</published>
      <updated>2010-06-07T18:41:53Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>admin</name>
            <email>michiko@mercuryseattle.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Federal Legislation"
        scheme="http://acreform.com/site/category/federal-legislation/"
        label="Federal Legislation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><i>Remember the Republican mantra of &#8220;no new taxes&#8221;? Well, get ready to hear more from what CBS News calls the &#8220;no new debt Democrats.&#8221; There&#8217;s a trend in the making&#8230;</i>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>


</feed>